ScopeMaster Compared with Popular Requirements Tools
Discover the powerful automated analysis features of ScopeMaster, making it the most effective tool for high quality requirements work on the market.
Only ScopeMaster can do this:
ScopeMaster interprets each requirement thoroughly, offering a slew of benefits above and beyond all competitors.
ScopeMaster assesses requirements from a reader’s perspective, highlighting common misinterpretations and misconceptions.
ScopeMaster dynamically maintains a CRUD matrix for all functions across an entire set of requirements.
ScopeMaster estimates functional size in ISO standards of both COSMIC function points and IFPUG function points.
ScopeMaster analyzes the text of each requirement, and quickly maps the results to an Object Class Diagram.
ScopeMaster tests and scores the quality of individual requirements as well as sets of requirements.
ScopeMaster automatically generates tests for requirements that are 100% traceable to the described functionality.
Automated tests scripts are also generated to accelerate continuous DevOps testing.
As of November 2023 | Analysis, Sizing & Refinement | Agile Tools | Systems Engineering Tools | Requirements NLP | Sizing | |||
ScopeMaster | Jira | Azure Devops | JamaConnect | IBM Doors | QVScribe | Modern Requirements with Azure Devops |
Estimancy | |
Essential Requirements ManagementCreate, edit, search, sort and label requirements | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ |
Epic – story heirarchy | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ |
Link requirements | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ |
Track changes | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ |
✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ | |
Automated Requirements QARequirements text is thoroughly tested for clarity and several other attributes | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | |
Consistency check | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | |
Sizeability check | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ |
Clarity check | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ |
User-oriented check | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | |
Conciseness check | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | |
Completeness check | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | |
Harmful wording check | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
Duplicate Detection | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ | ✘ | |
Automated Analysis support languages English, French, Italian, Portuguese and Spanish |
✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | English only | English only | English only | ✔ |
Custom Taxonomy support | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ | |||
No setup, or pre-training | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ |
No setup, or pre-training | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ |
Automated Test Generation | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
Heavy lifting of automated sizing in IFPUG and Simple function Points |
✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ |
Automated estimation of (CRUD) missing requirements |
✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | |
Dynamic resizing after refinement |
✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
Detect buried functionality (a common cause of missizing) |
✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ |
Auto-generated Functional Test Generation Functionally traceable test scenarios are auto-generated to save your testers time. |
✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
Auto-generated Use Case Model Diagrams Insightful dynamically generated use case model diagrams bring visual clarity to sets of requirements. |
✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
Auto-generated Class Diagram Class diagrams help bridge the technical interpretation of functional requirements, from product owner to designer. |
✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
Automated CRUD Analysis Basic CRUD and user – oriented CRUD analysis matrices dynamically maintained, |
✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
Kanban Support Customisable Kanban board for tracking status |
✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | via integration | via integration | ✔ | ✘ |
REST APIs Integrate with other tools via a rich set of API functionality. |
✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ | ✔ | ✘ |
CFP and SFP available through API |
✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
Issue tracking | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✔ | ✘ |
Comments For easy collaboration |
✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | ✔ | |
Suitable for non-software work | ✘ | ✔ | ✔ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |